Lead Articles

Metals Exchanges

Plastic Futures


The impact of delisting on the JSE

SA Equity Market Risk Premium

Instruments and Investments

Weather Derivatives as a Risk Management Tool

Earnings vs Cash Based Valuation Techniques

Regulations / Compliance

Code of Conduct into Securities Act

Securities Services Act

Global Risk Management Survey


Stock Price Volatility

Social Responsibility Issues

The Changing Landscape

How capital markets benefit the poor


ABSA Investment Overview


New Treasury Module


How capital markets benefit the poor
By Ingrid Goodspeed, South African Institute of Financial Markets

he World Bank and donor agencies like the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID) have adopted the theme “making markets work” when delineating their private sector development strategies to reduce poverty. In South Africa FinMark Trust has adopted the mission “making financial markets for the poor”. This article picks up this theme and considers how the capital market can be made to work for the poor. The supposition is that capital markets have an impressive record of financial innovation and if this could be directed towards issues such as dead capital it would contribute towards achieving the Millennium Development Goal of halving the number of poor by 2015.

1. Capital and dead capital
Capital has two dimensions. Firstly it has the physical dimension of an asset such as land, equipment and livestock. In addition it has the potential to generate further production i.e., it is a source of additional production.

According to de Soto in his seminal work “The Mystery of Capital“, the major impediment that prevents the developing world from benefiting from capitalism is its inability to produce capital. He states that “capital is the force that raises the productivity of labour and creates the wealth of nations. It is the lifeblood of the capitalist system, the foundation of progress and the one thing that the poor countries of the world cannot seem to produce for themselves no matter how eagerly their people engage in all other activities that characterise a capitalist economy”.

The basic tenet of de Soto's (2000) work is that the poor in developing countries, in spite of holding considerable property, do not have a system for property rights that can turn these assets into capital. The poor possess property not in the formal property system, but in the extralegal, underground system that has its own laws and customs. Thus because they do not have formal title to the assets, the assets represent dead capital as the poor cannot use them as collateral to obtain credit i.e., for capital formation.

De Soto estimates that about 85% of urban land tracts in developing countries and between 40% and 53% of their tracts of rural land represent dead capital. He further estimates that the total latent value of the real estate held but not legally owned by the poor in the developing world and in transition countries is in the order of about $9.3 trillion.

Clearly the answer to capital formation in developing countries would be to formalise informal ownership. This implies adequate and appropriate laws that establish property, tenurial and foreclosure rights, a sound mortgage insurance system, and information systems to record credit scoring data and loan default rates. However without enforcement, property rights for the poor are meaningless.

2. The capital market
Capital markets are markets in which institutions, corporations, companies and governments raise long-term funds to finance capital investments and expansion projects. The bonds and other long-term debt market as well as the equity market constitute the capital markets.

There are isolated incidents of the capital market being used to mobilise dead capital. For example:

  • Shelter-Afrique, the company for habitat and housing in Africa has demonstrated that the capital market can be a sustainable source of financing for housing and urban development. It successfully issued bonds in the capital markets of selected countries including in Kenya, Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Guinea Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal, and Togo. The proceeds from these bonds have been on lent to developers and financial institutions for housing development.
  • UN-Habitat is developing a new facility –the Slum Upgrading Facility (SUF). This facility envisages providing technical assistance and bridge-financing to mobilize domestic capital and investment for slum upgrading initiatives in developing countries. The facility, in its first three years will design, field test and scale-up financial instruments that attract investments from banks, other housing finance institutions and micro-finance institutions.

In poorer developing countries and in outreach to underprivileged sections of the population in particular, the private sector is often not prepared to make longer-term commitments without for example guarantees by government or official development agencies.

3. Capital market innovations
According to Shelter-Afrique S.A. the problem of generating resources for housing in Africa is not necessarily an absence of savings at the household level but a lack of effective institutions and instruments to mobilize these savings and channel them into housing investments.

Could asset-backed securitization be used to mobilise dead capital by securitising the loans of a community or rural village? Group lending of this ilk will enable a community or rural village to provide additional collateral for a number of loans through a pledge by the group to repay the loans. The incentive to repay the loan is based on peer pressure i.e., if one group member defaults the other group members make up the payment amount. However mortgage securitization rests on a complex matrix of legal and institutional structures that may not and must be addressed in this context.

It is possible to form a company with the property of a community or village as the asset of the company and members of the community or village as shareholders? The company could raise a loan using both the property and group lending repayment pledge as collateral. However should the company default on the loan, would the lender be able to take possession of the collateral?

It is not clear whether the poor would want to borrow money with their property or houses as collateral. There may be reluctance to endanger a household's / community’s / village’s financial viability. Many may fear the consequences of failing to repay the loan and would prefer to use informal savings facilities like stokvels to obtain credit. This raises the question: is it possible to securitise the cash flow of a stokvels?

4. Conclusion
The road out of poverty is built by economic growth. In the world’s developed economies capitalism promotes economic growth by incorporating incentives that encourage production, exchange and innovation supported by clearly defined property rights secured by the rule of law.

In developing countries, the poor possess capital, but it cannot be put to use to generate additional capital – something that is essential for economic growth. And herein lies the challenge for participants in the capital market. Can they use their creativity and expertise to create the tools necessary to mobile dead capital?

De Soto, Hernando, 2000, The Mystery of Capital, New York: Basic Books.
Shelter-Afrique S.A., 2003, Domestic Resource Mobilization for Housing Development in Africa, Annual Report 2003.

Copyright & Disclaimer , SAIFM. All Rights Reserved. Designed & Developed by [ Live Q ]